After nearly 3 years of still finding my name, distorted medical, personal, professional, political and family history posted online by my convicted cyberstalker, or through 3rd parties associated with him, I have begun to wonder, what the criminal investigation and charges really meant? So I looked once more at his plea, that is, the charges he agreed to accept responsibility for, and the terms of that agreement. He can not contact me through 3rd parties. He can not surveil me. He needs to leave me alone. Yet the judge found him in contempt for violaitons yet again, on 4/8/2011.
But will it mean anything? Will it stop the posts from occurring? Will it stop him from surveilling me? Will it finally stop him from harassing me? His violations, (post-jail posts), communicate that he did not sign this in good faith; that he did not mean it. I guess he fooled us all once more. He seems to want to convey that it was my case, and not the state’s case against him, but this is a distortion. My input was minor. An individual can not bring a criminal case against someone. But he knows this. It is just a game to him. The charges were filed based on the investigation of a Detective, with access to all the technology he needed, as he works on a federal electronic crimes task force, as well as for the King County Sheriff’s Office. He did his own investigation, with his own tools. It had very little to do with me.
Had he not created the posts, beginning in February 2009, I would never have needed to go to the police. but he did, and so it set this ball in motion. Before he began posting in 2009, he said I blocked him and he is right I did. He also said he found me online and that I was easy to track. But does this give someone the right to harass someone for the next 3 years? Does it give someone the right to seek out their personal information from over 10 years ago, and threaten to post it? Does it give them the right to state the restraining Order said he was into bestiality and had rape fantasies, (he later said his family gave him the idea to post this), and then post it though multiple accounts, with my full name, (yes these are all his accounts). If you look at the original temporary order he was referring to, it did not state this. This is harassment. There was no legitimate purpose for this post. Here is the permanant restraining order, entered on 8/24/2011 and in effect until 2020.
He has done this to others, and others have noticed. It seems to be a game of sorts. Even the threat of jail does not stop him. Well, it is not a game to me.
Leave a Reply